Interdental Brushes vs Floss: What The Evidence Says
š 11 min read Ā Ā·Ā Updated 30/06/2026
Quick Summary
ā For gaps big enough to take one, interdental brushes have the stronger evidence base than floss for reducing plaque and gum bleeding
ā Floss is the right tool for tight contacts where no brush will physically fit ā it is not obsolete, it is second-choice
ā The 2016 "flossing doesn't work" headlines were misread ā low-quality evidence does NOT mean no effect
ā The Cochrane systematic review (Worthington et al., 2019) found interdental brushes plus brushing may reduce plaque and gingivitis more than brushing alone
ā Size is everything with an interdental brush ā too small does nothing, too large traumatises the gum. Most mouths need 2ā3 sizes
ā Bleeding for the first 1ā2 weeks of interdental cleaning is expected and is not a reason to stop
ā The only genuinely wrong answer is doing neither
Quick Answer
In the interdental brushes vs floss debate, the evidence favours the brush. Systematic reviews of interdental cleaning ā including the Cochrane review by Worthington and colleagues (2019) and the meta-review by SƤlzer and colleagues in the Journal of Clinical Periodontology (2015) ā consistently rate interdental brushes above floss for removing interdental plaque and reducing gingival bleeding, in people whose gaps are large enough to accept a brush. Floss remains the correct tool for tight contacts where a brush cannot physically pass. The practical rule: use an interdental brush wherever one fits, and floss the gaps where it does not. Once a day, every day. Doing neither is the only choice the evidence clearly condemns.
Why Interdental Cleaning Exists At All
A toothbrush ā manual or electric, cheap or expensive ā cannot reach the surfaces between your teeth. The bristles ride over the contact point. They clean the outer face, the inner face and the chewing surface, and then they skip the two flat walls that face each other across the gap. Roughly 40% of each tooth's surface area sits in that blind spot.
That blind spot is not a cosmetic problem. It is the exact anatomical site where gum disease most commonly begins. The interdental papilla ā the small triangle of gum that fills the space between two teeth ā is the first tissue in the mouth to become inflamed when plaque is left undisturbed, and it is almost always the first place bleeding shows up.
So when someone tells you they brush twice a day and their gums still bleed, they are usually not lying and they are usually not brushing badly. They are simply cleaning the 60% of the tooth that was never the problem. If you want the full picture on why gums bleed, read What Causes Bleeding Gums: Every Cause Explained.
The core principle
Gum disease starts between the teeth. A toothbrush cannot go between the teeth. Therefore brushing alone ā no matter how good ā is NOT a complete oral hygiene routine. Interdental cleaning is not an optional extra. It is the half of the job most people skip.
The 2016 Flossing Story, Told Honestly
In August 2016 the Associated Press published an investigation by reporter Jeff Donn examining the evidence behind daily flossing. It found that the studies underpinning the recommendation were small, short, poorly designed, or industry-funded ā and that the US federal dietary guidelines had quietly dropped their flossing recommendation because the evidence had never been formally reviewed. The story went global under headlines along the lines of "flossing doesn't work".
That headline was a misreading, and it is worth being precise about why.
"Weak evidence" does NOT mean "doesn't work"
Low-certainty evidence means we cannot be confident in the size of the effect ā the trials were too small, too short, or too sloppy to measure it well. It does NOT mean the effect is zero. Absence of high-quality evidence is NOT evidence of absence. The Cochrane reviews of flossing did not find that floss fails. They found that the trials testing it were of low quality, and that within those limits floss plus brushing still reduced gingivitis more than brushing alone.
There is also a mundane reason floss tests badly: most people floss incorrectly. A trial that recruits ordinary people, hands them floss, and measures their gums three months later is not testing floss. It is testing floss-as-performed-by-untrained-humans-who-mostly-do-not-do-it. Studies that include supervised, taught flossing tend to show clearer benefit. That is a real-world limitation of floss, not a reason to dismiss it ā but it is one of the strongest arguments for the brush, which is dramatically harder to get wrong.
What The Evidence Actually Says About Interdental Brushes
The interdental brush has quietly accumulated the better evidence base ā and, more importantly, the more consistent one.
Read that table carefully, because the honest summary is nuanced. The evidence for interdental brushes is better than the evidence for floss ā but the evidence base for interdental cleaning as a whole is not as strong as anyone would like. Dentistry has never funded the large, long, well-blinded trials that cardiology takes for granted. The direction of the effect is consistent across every review. The size of it is not well measured. Anyone telling you either device is "clinically proven" to a specific percentage is selling you something.
Bleeding when you clean between your teeth is a signal, not a stop sign.
LACALUTĀ® Aktiv ā the German clinical system with aluminium lactate, chlorhexidine 0.25% and sodium fluoride. Founded 1925.
Shop LACALUT AktivInterdental Brushes: How To Use One Properly
An interdental brush is a small cylindrical or tapered bristle head on a wire core, sold in graded sizes ā typically colour-coded from the very fine (for tight spaces) to the very wide (for large gaps and around bridges). It works by physically scrubbing both tooth walls at once, which is precisely what floss struggles to do.
Size Is Everything
This is the single point most people get wrong, and it is the reason so many people buy a pack of interdental brushes, use them for a week, and conclude they do nothing.
The size rule
The correct brush slides in with light resistance and never needs force. If you have to push, it is too big. If it rattles through with no contact, it is too small. Most mouths need two or three different sizes across different gaps ā the space between your front incisors is nothing like the space between your back molars. A single-size pack is almost never the right answer. Ask your dentist or hygienist to size you at your next visit; it takes two minutes and it is the highest-value two minutes in preventive dentistry.
Technique
Floss: Still The Right Tool For Tight Contacts
Floss is not obsolete. It is the correct instrument for a specific job: the gaps where no interdental brush will physically fit. If your teeth are tightly packed ā and if you have never had gum recession, they very likely are ā then for those contacts floss is not the second-best option. It is the only option.
The catch, as the trial evidence suggests, is that floss is easy to do badly. Most people saw it back and forth across the contact point, snap it into the gum, and never take it below the gum line ā which is where the plaque that causes gum disease actually lives.
The C-Shape Technique
Floss picks ā the little plastic Y-shaped holders ā are a reasonable compromise. They make the C-shape harder to achieve, so they are technically inferior to string floss. But a floss pick you actually use every night beats string floss you keep in the drawer. Adherence beats theoretical superiority.
Water Flossers: Where They Fit
Water flossers (oral irrigators) fire a pulsed jet of water into the interdental space. They are genuinely useful, and they are genuinely oversold.
The reasonable reading of the evidence is that a water flosser is better than nothing by a wide margin, and consistently reduces gingival bleeding scores ā but it is NOT as effective at physically disrupting the plaque biofilm as a brush or floss that mechanically scrubs the tooth surface. Plaque is a sticky, structured biofilm. Water pressure flushes debris and disturbs the loose surface; a bristle or a filament shears it off.
Who a water flosser is genuinely right for
People with fixed orthodontic braces, bridges, implants or splints, where a brush or floss cannot navigate the hardware. People with arthritis, tremor, limited dexterity or one working hand, for whom threading floss is not realistic. And people who flatly will not do anything else ā in which case a water flosser used nightly is worth far more than an interdental brush used never.
Head-To-Head: Interdental Brush vs Floss vs Water Flosser
So Should You Use A Brush Or Floss? The Verdict
The verdict
Use an interdental brush wherever one fits. Use floss on the gaps where it does not. Once a day, every day, every gap. That is not a compromise position ā it is what the evidence actually supports. The brush has the better data and is far harder to use wrongly; floss covers the contacts the brush physically cannot enter. Most adult mouths need both. And the only genuinely wrong answer ā the one every systematic review agrees on ā is doing neither.
Do it once a day, not twice. Interdental plaque takes roughly 24 hours to reorganise into a mature, damaging biofilm, so a thorough daily disruption is enough. Twice-daily interdental cleaning has never been shown to beat once-daily, and it increases the risk of gum trauma from over-enthusiastic technique.
Do it at night, before brushing. Cleaning between the teeth first lifts the interdental plaque out of the gap, so the fluoride in your toothpaste can then reach the surfaces it was blocked from.
Bleeding When You Start: Expected, Not A Reason To Stop
Almost everyone who starts interdental cleaning after a long gap bleeds. Often for the first several nights. This alarms people, and a great many of them conclude they are injuring themselves and quietly stop. It is the single most common reason interdental cleaning routines fail.
The bleeding is NOT the brush injuring healthy tissue. It is inflamed, plaque-laden gum tissue ā already engorged with fragile capillaries ā being touched for the first time. Healthy gums do not bleed when cleaned properly. Bleeding is the diagnosis, not the injury.
For what that persistence means and how far it can be walked back, see Can Gum Disease Be Reversed? What The Evidence Actually Says and 7 Warning Signs Of Gum Disease You Should Never Ignore.
Where Toothpaste Fits Into This
Interdental cleaning is mechanical. It disrupts the biofilm. What you brush with afterwards is chemical ā and the two are complementary, not interchangeable. No toothpaste will clean a surface it never touches, and no interdental brush delivers fluoride.
LACALUTĀ® Aktiv is a German clinical formulation built around aluminium lactate, chlorhexidine 0.25% and sodium fluoride, from a brand founded in 1925. It is designed for people whose gums bleed and who are serious about their daily routine ā the exact people who should also be cleaning between their teeth every night. The LACALUT Aktiv 2-Part System pairs the toothpaste with the mouthwash, and the sample pack includes dental floss so there is no excuse to skip the half of the job that matters most. If you want the full routine in one box, the Aktiv Complete System adds the toothbrush.
Clean between your teeth. Then brush with something that earns its place.
LACALUTĀ® Aktiv ā aluminium lactate, chlorhexidine 0.25% and sodium fluoride. German clinical oral care since 1925.
Shop The LACALUT Aktiv SystemMedical disclaimer: This article is for general information only and does not constitute dental or medical advice. Interdental brush sizing should be assessed by a registered dental practitioner. If your gums bleed persistently, book a dental assessment.
